The Under Appreciated
Value of Capital Cycle Analysis
In our public markets
investments at Volta
Global, we are fortunate not to be constrained to a specific strategy or
segment of the markets. We are only looking for the best opportunities for
long-term capital appreciation, in a completely sector and asset class agnostic
manner.
Such opportunities often do present themselves as
a result of two situations:
Finding
truly great businesses with sustainable competitive advantages that are
temporarily mispriced due to market “noise” or short-term events (the much
espoused “Buffet/Munger approach”).
Significant developments taking
place in the supply side of an industry that often go unnoticed by the market.
Situation #1 is widely covered, and any student
of the markets will be very familiar with those teachings. Situation #2 is less
appreciated but equally powerful, and forms the basis of “capital cycle
analysis” — an investment philosophy long championed by Marathon Asset
Management (and excellently covered in their book Capital Returns.)
While capital cycle analysis is
a very simple fundamental concept — companies are impacted by changes in the
supply side of the industry in which they operate much more than changes in the
demand side — it is also the one that most investors and analysts often ignore.
They instead devote a majority of their time and effort into analyzing the
demand side, which is much harder to accurately predict, and in the long run much
less impactful to a company’s profitability, and thus their stock price.
I strongly recommend reading
Capital Returns in its entirety, but the key aspects of the approach can be
quickly summarized as follows:
Stock prices are
mostly driven by long-term levels of profitability, and reward companies that
can consistently earn returns above their cost of capital.
Changes
in the supply side of an industry are more important to profitability than
those on the demand side, yet the vast majority of professional analysts and
investors are trained to focus their attention on the demand side. The
implication then is that changes in the supply side tend to be under
appreciated by the market, and slower to show up in company stock prices.
Value
vs. Growth is a mostly irrelevant construct for capital cycle analysis — high
valuations alone are not enough to kill a positive supply side dynamic, and
companies in industries going through a lasting positive change in supply side
dynamics can sustain high valuations for longer periods of time than the market
expects.
Many investors are not well
suited to performing proper capital cycle analysis, which requires both an
“outside view” (tough for industry “experts” to have) and a very long-term
perspective (very tough for most active managers to have these days).
Jeff Evans, Volta Global